Leading Neurodiverse & High-Sensitivity Teams: Performance Without Harm

Leading Neurodiverse & High-Sensitivity Teams: Performance Without Harm

January 20, 20263 min read

Practical, trauma-informed leadership skills for ADHD, Autism, PTSD, grief, and anxiety—while maintaining standards.

Leading Neurodiverse & High-Sensitivity Teams: Performance Without Harm

By: Dr. Leslie Westbrook, LMFT

workplace

TL;DR (60 seconds)

“Invisible” performance issues aren’t usually motivation problems—they’re mismatch problems. You can keep standards high without harm by using small role/environment tweaks, a simple feedback framework, sensory-smart meeting norms, and escalation pathways that de-escalate. Result: better performance, higher retention, fewer misused PIPs.


Why this matters now

As a clinician partnering with companies and teams, I see a recurring pattern: talented people who think deeply, feel intensely, and notice risk early are labeled “difficult,” “checked out,” or “not a culture fit.” Meanwhile, leaders are unsure how to support ADHD, Autism, PTSD, grief, and anxiety without lowering the bar.

Good news: you don’t need to lower the bar. You need clear expectations + smarter support—so people can meet standards consistently.


Why Great People Are Struggling

When one-size-fits-all management meets different brains.

  • “Invisible” performance issues: missed deadlines, uneven output, shutdowns under pressure.

  • Masking & avoidant communication: agreement in meetings, stalls in execution.

  • Misused PIPs: coachable moments escalated into discipline.

  • Turnover of high performers: systems thinkers who push quality quietly exit.

Root cause: one-size-fits-all management in roles that demand fit-for-brain design.


1) Role & Environment Tweaks (fit beats force)

Small, reversible adjustments can create big gains.

Try this menu:

  • Task size: break large deliverables into milestones with explicit “done” criteria.

  • Time blocks: 25–45-minute focus sprints + scheduled decompression windows.

  • Context switching: limit back-to-back meetings; cluster similar work.

  • Sensory load: quiet zones/headsets; reduce notification noise; camera-optional norms.

  • Strength carving: assign system review/QA/root-cause analysis to high-insight employees; pair with a “completer” for documentation follow-through.

Outcome: steadier throughput, fewer flare-ups, clearer quality signals.


2) The 3-Step Feedback Framework (clear, kind, repeatable)

Plain English quick guide

  • Anchor = say the standard and why it matters. “Our clients expect replies within 24 hours. When we miss that, projects stack up and customers get frustrated.”

  • Ask = find out what’s getting in the way. “What’s making the 24-hour response tough right now—meeting load, task volume, or something else?”

  • Align = agree on one change and how you’ll check it. “Let’s try a 2-line same-day update, then a fuller reply by 10 a.m. tomorrow. I’ll check in Friday to see if this solved it.”

The formal steps

  1. Anchor (name the standard + impact)

  2. Ask (invite the constraint)

  3. Align (co-design one change + a check)

Why it works: You protect the standard and address the real barrier (working memory, time blindness, overload) in a way that’s humane, specific, and repeatable.


3) Sensory-Smart Meeting Norms (reduce noise, increase signal)

  • Agenda-first with owner/outcome.

  • Queue/hand-raise; capture ideas in chat.

  • Camera-optional + recording to lower cognitive load and improve recall.

  • Decision log (3 lines)—decision, owner, due-by—posted within 15 minutes.

Result: less overwhelm, better decisions, faster follow-through.


4) Escalation That De-escalates (when stakes rise)

Not every issue needs a PIP. Start with a brief stability plan.

Stability Plan (one-pager):

  • Scope: which deliverables are slipping?

  • Support: choose 1–2 tweaks (time block, pairing, milestone map).

  • Signals: green/yellow/red for 2–4 weeks.

  • Check-ins: 10 minutes M/W/F.

  • Exit criteria: what “back to steady” looks like.

If stability fails → a constructive PIP focused on skills & systems, not character.


What this looks like for engineering, ops, and service teams

  • Engineering: low-meeting focus blocks; PR templates with “definition of done.”

  • Operations: visual SOPs, checklists, “start-here” runbooks; limit pager/radio noise.

  • Client-facing: pre-brief roles; two-line debriefs; regulation phrases for escalation (“Let’s slow this down so we get it right.”)


Metrics that show it’s working

  • On-time delivery / cycle time (↑)

  • Quality defects / rework (↓)

  • Retention of high-insight/ND employees (↑)

  • PIP-to-success conversion (↑)

  • Manager confidence (↑)

  • Team psychological safety / eNPS (↑)

Director, Clinical Psychologist, Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist #127260 at Vision Counseling Services FKA AMCSI

Dr. Leslie Westbrook, LMFT

Director, Clinical Psychologist, Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist #127260 at Vision Counseling Services FKA AMCSI

Back to Blog